Shared Claude Team for Scientists access supports structured lab training and research workflows.
AI can now generate protein-complex hypotheses in seconds. The hard part is no longer making the prediction. It is knowing which predictions are chemically real. My lab builds chemistry-aware methods to tell them apart, in the cases where metals, glycans, cofactors, and interface energetics decide the answer.
One question runs through all of it: when does an AI-predicted structure reflect real biochemistry, and when is it just a confident guess? Every project tests that where chemistry matters most, and pairs computation with experiment.
AlphaFold 3 proposes a protein assembly in seconds, but each prediction remains a hypothesis. We stress-test repeated-seed models where chemistry can change the answer: protein interfaces, metal sites, glycans, cofactors, and assembly state. The TYR-TYRP1-TYRP2 melanogenic system gives us a biologically important test case connected to pigmentation and albinism.
Human diamine oxidase (hDAO / AOC1) contributes to extracellular histamine and diamine clearance. We use structure prediction, identity-audited ligand preparation, and docking controls to prioritize supplement-derived compounds for bounded biochemical testing. Experimental activity and stability measurements provide the next validation layer.
Some protein surfaces are strained and unstable; others lock cleanly into complexes. We are looking for the reusable rules that separate the two: a grammar of stabilization drawn from PDB structures, binding energetics, and protein language models. If those rules transfer, they tell us which proteins will pair stably, and why.
How do enzymes selectively oxidize some of the most inert hydrocarbons, and can they do it in greener solvents? We study fungal peroxygenases and their active-site chemistry for selective C-H oxyfunctionalization of branched and cyclic alkanes in deep eutectic solvents, with an eye toward cleaner chemical manufacturing.
Undergraduate researchers at Stern College for Women carry the core of this work, co-mentored by MS Biotechnology graduate researchers in a near-peer structure. Contributions are documented, reviewed, and credited according to the standards of each scholarly output.
The lab evaluates structure-prediction hypotheses across repeated runs and examines metal sites, glycans, cofactors, protein interfaces, and energetic controls. Experimental measurements are used where available to test specific biochemical predictions.
Students can arrive with no computational background and learn to carry a defined research question from the literature through analysis, evidence review, and scientific communication. The program is run as a documented system, reflecting the same operational discipline that defines the science.
Seven skill-gated phases, a training manual, an individual notebook for every student, and mentor sign-off at each step.
Students are taught to use AI as the field now requires: with prompt discipline, blinded scoring, and results stated no more strongly than the evidence supports. The approach has been presented at ACS.
Student contributions are documented. Authorship and presentation credit follow the contribution standards of the relevant field and output.
Undergraduate and graduate researchers welcome. No prior computational-biology experience required.
Apply to the lab →The lab combines access, training, and scientific controls. A 25-seat Claude Team for Scientists environment supports supervised research and AI-literacy work, while the Research Cockpit captures artifacts, surfaces missing evidence, and routes scientific judgment to the PI.
Shared Claude Team for Scientists access supports structured lab training and research workflows.
Prediction outputs, notebooks, figures, and audit flags are organized into reviewable evidence panels with explicit provenance.
In development: a cross-institutional framework connecting educators, researchers, students, and responsible-AI practitioners around applied AI literacy and AI-for-science projects. Prospective institutional collaborators can connect through Olga Lavinda's engagement page.
The lab presented three posters at ACS Fall 2026 across structural biology, medicinal chemistry, and AI literacy. Tiferet Aharon presented the TYR-family project, received an ACS Conference Travel Award, and participated in the Committee on Science Innovative Program.



For research collaborations, student research, or funding inquiries.
Get in touch